class action

More

ROSEN, A TOP RANKED LAW FIRM, Encourages Tupperware Brands Corporation Investors To Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline In Securities Class Actio…

  • June 7, 2023
(MENAFN- EIN Presswire) WHY: NEW YORK, April 30, 2023 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of the securities of Tupperware Brands Corporation TUP between March 10, 2021 and March 16, 2023 , both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), of the important May 19, 2023 lead plaintiff deadline in the securities class action commenced by the Firm.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Tupperware securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Tupperware class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email or for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than May 19, 2023. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm

Read the rest
More

ROSEN, A LEADING LAW FIRM, Encourages GWG Holdings, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action – GWGHQ

  • June 6, 2023

WHY: New York, NY – (NewMediaWire) – April 29, 2023 – Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of GWG Holdings, Inc. L Bonds or Preferred Stock of GWG (“GWG securities”) (OTC: GWGHQ) between December 23, 2017 and April 20, 2022, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), of the important June 2, 2023 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased GWG securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the GWG class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=14048 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] or [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than June 2, 2023. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm

Read the rest
More

ROSEN, A LEADING LAW FIRM, Encourages Vertex Energy, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action – VTNR

  • June 5, 2023

WHY: New York, NY – (NewMediaWire) – April 29, 2023 – Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Vertex Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: VTNR) between April 1, 2022 and August 8, 2022, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), of the important June 12, 2023 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Vertex Energy securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Vertex Energy class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=12724 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] or [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than June 12, 2023. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the

Read the rest
More

The Schall Law Firm Encourages Investors in Iris Energy Limited with Losses of $100,000 to Contact the Firm

  • March 12, 2023

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / February 6, 2023 / The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, announces the filing of a class action lawsuit against Iris Energy Limited (“Iris” or “the Company”) (NASDAQ:IREN) for violations of the federal securities laws.

The Schall Law Firm, Monday, February 6, 2023, Press release picture

Investors who purchased the Company’s shares pursuant and/or traceable to the Company’s initial public offering conducted on November 17, 2021 (the “IPO”) and/or between November 17, 2021 and November 1, 2022, inclusive (the “Class Period”), are encouraged to contact the firm before February 6, 2023.

If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate.

We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law Firm, 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2460, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 310-301-3335, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm’s website at www.schallfirm.com, or by email at [email protected].

The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member.

According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. The Company’s Bitcoin miners were unlikely to generate cash flow sufficient to service debt financing. The Company’s financing agreements to procure equipment were not sustainable. Based on these facts, the Company’s public statements throughout the IPO period were false and materially misleading. When the market learned the truth about Iris, investors suffered damages.

Join the case to recover your losses.

The Schall Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.

CONTACT:

The

Read the rest
More

Wells Fargo Agrees to Pay $300 Million to Settle With Shareholders Over Auto Insurance Disclosures

  • February 28, 2023

(Reuters) -Wells Fargo & Co agreed to pay $300 million to settle a shareholder lawsuit claiming the bank hid that it had pushed unnecessary insurance on auto loan customers, according to documents filed in U.S. court on Tuesday.

The Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern California, which led the class action brought on behalf of investors, said in federal court in San Francisco that Wells Fargo and its former chief executive, Timothy Sloan, had agreed to settle.

The bank did not admit wrongdoing.

The deal requires approval from U.S. Judge James Donato, who is overseeing the case. Trial in the case had been scheduled for Feb. 27.

“While we disagree with the allegations in this case, we are pleased to have resolved this legacy issue,” a Wells Fargo spokesperson said in a statement.

An attorney who represents Sloan did not immediately reply to a request for comment.

Scott Saham of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, the law firm representing Wells Fargo shareholders, said the settlement “is part of remediating the entire spectrum of harm that you get in a complex fraud case.”

The lawsuit stems from one of the San Francisco-based bank’s past scandals over sales practices that resulted in government investigations and fines.

Wells Fargo disclosed in July 2017 that hundreds of thousands of customers had been unnecessarily charged for “collateral protection insurance,” which covers auto lenders when borrowers are uninsured. The bank said it had learned of concerns a year earlier.

Shareholders sued in 2018, alleging Wells Fargo misled them when Sloan said in November 2016 that he was “not aware of any issues” when asked about the bank’s sales practices and culture.

The bank also concealed auto insurance issues from the U.S. Senate Banking Committee in November 2016, the investors alleged.

The lawsuit sought damages for investors

Read the rest
More

Law firms in Meta antitrust lawsuit clash over lead role

  • February 27, 2023

Two major US law firms are feuding over which one will lead a consumer antitrust class action against Meta Platforms Inc’s Facebook, after a judge scrapped a prior order appointing them both as co-leaders for the plaintiffs and started from scratch.

US District Judge James Donato in San Francisco said in January that he would make a new determination to select one of the firms to lead the class action amid quarreling between Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan. Part of the clash included a Hagens Berman partner accusing Quinn Emanuel of discounting her views based on her gender. Quinn Emanuel denied the allegation, calling it a “mystery.”

“I have significant experience-based qualms about these multi-headed plaintiff-side structures,” Donato said at a recent hearing in the case, as he heard about the dispute and wiped out a 2021 order by another judge who appointed both firms. “You don’t need them.”

The underlying case involves class claims from consumers and advertisers that Facebook exploited user data to maintain its market power. The company has denied the allegations from both sets of class plaintiffs.

The two law firms on Friday night submitted their pitches to Donato about why he should appoint them solely rather than jointly to lead the consumer class.

In its filing, Quinn Emanuel said partner Kevin Teruya was the “architect of the consumer class’s case.” Hagens Berman in its submission questioned Quinn Emanuel’s rates, suggesting they were too high.

Plaintiffs’ firms routinely vie for court-appointed leadership roles in class actions, allowing them to steer litigation and potentially to recover bigger portions of legal fees in cases that settle or win at trial.

A representative from Hagens Berman did not immediately comment, and a Quinn Emanuel spokesperson declined to comment.

The lawyers who are seeking

Read the rest
More

Wells Fargo agrees to pay $300 mln to settle with shareholders over auto insurance disclosures

  • February 25, 2023

Feb 7 (Reuters) – Wells Fargo & Co (WFC.N) agreed to pay $300 million to settle a shareholder lawsuit claiming the bank hid that it had pushed unnecessary insurance on auto loan customers, according to documents filed in U.S. court on Tuesday.

The Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern California, which led the class action brought on behalf of investors, said in federal court in San Francisco that Wells Fargo and its former chief executive, Timothy Sloan, had agreed to settle.

The bank did not admit wrongdoing.

The deal requires approval from U.S. Judge James Donato, who is overseeing the case. Trial in the case had been scheduled for Feb. 27.

“While we disagree with the allegations in this case, we are pleased to have resolved this legacy issue,” a Wells Fargo spokesperson said in a statement.

An attorney who represents Sloan did not immediately reply to a request for comment.

Latest Updates

View 2 more stories

Scott Saham of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, the law firm representing Wells Fargo shareholders, said the settlement “is part of remediating the entire spectrum of harm that you get in a complex fraud case.”

The lawsuit stems from one of the San Francisco-based bank’s past scandals over sales practices that resulted in government investigations and fines.

Wells Fargo disclosed in July 2017 that hundreds of thousands of customers had been unnecessarily charged for “collateral protection insurance,” which covers auto lenders when borrowers are uninsured. The bank said it had learned of concerns a year earlier.

Shareholders sued in 2018, alleging Wells Fargo misled them when Sloan said in November 2016 that he was “not aware of any issues” when asked about the bank‘s sales practices and culture.

The bank also concealed auto insurance issues from the U.S. Senate Banking Committee in

Read the rest