baby powder” sizes=”100vw” src=”https://images.axios.com/vsfCiuSOg0Hn6E7GjcED1o2yPB8=/320×180/smart/2023/01/31/1675166470487.jpg?w=320 320w, https://images.axios.com/vsfCiuSOg0Hn6E7GjcED1o2yPB8=/320×180/smart/2023/01/31/1675166470487.jpg?w=320 320w, https://images.axios.com/1KmFgyI7iFmJt2ZQSbo2WX2MWnI=/640×360/smart/2023/01/31/1675166470487.jpg?w=640 640w, https://images.axios.com/1KmFgyI7iFmJt2ZQSbo2WX2MWnI=/640×360/smart/2023/01/31/1675166470487.jpg?w=640 640w, https://images.axios.com/A1zYgdIoe5PhGxSfrEmWBh9iE_8=/768×432/smart/2023/01/31/1675166470487.jpg?w=768 768w, https://images.axios.com/A1zYgdIoe5PhGxSfrEmWBh9iE_8=/768×432/smart/2023/01/31/1675166470487.jpg?w=768 768w, https://images.axios.com/Bz67nJhbJBVoB-JUQZp9w-aINMw=/1024×576/smart/2023/01/31/1675166470487.jpg?w=1024 1024w, https://images.axios.com/Bz67nJhbJBVoB-JUQZp9w-aINMw=/1024×576/smart/2023/01/31/1675166470487.jpg?w=1024 1024w, https://images.axios.com/R9rntj16FvBOLrToueKWhaDKgCU=/1366×768/smart/2023/01/31/1675166470487.jpg?w=1366 1366w, https://images.axios.com/R9rntj16FvBOLrToueKWhaDKgCU=/1366×768/smart/2023/01/31/1675166470487.jpg?w=1366 1366w, https://images.axios.com/JIYPQF149PFAi02E39HzuDfU84k=/1600×900/smart/2023/01/31/1675166470487.jpg?w=1600 1600w, https://images.axios.com/JIYPQF149PFAi02E39HzuDfU84k=/1600×900/smart/2023/01/31/1675166470487.jpg?w=1600 1600w, https://images.axios.com/-dqFUPpUWNCdnadoLhflbzI3vVU=/1920×1080/smart/2023/01/31/1675166470487.jpg?w=1920 1920w, https://images.axios.com/-dqFUPpUWNCdnadoLhflbzI3vVU=/1920×1080/smart/2023/01/31/1675166470487.jpg?w=1920 1920w” decoding=”async” data-nimg=”responsive” style=”position:absolute;top:0;left:0;bottom:0;right:0;box-sizing:border-box;padding:0;border:none;margin:auto;display:block;width:0;height:0;min-width:100%;max-width:100%;min-height:100%;max-height:100%”/
Johnson & Johnson’s baby powder. Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
You have to actually be broke to file for bankruptcy protection — at least that’s what a federal appellate court ruled Monday.
Driving the news: The court dismissed the bankruptcy filing by a subsidiary of corporate giant Johnson & Johnson. J&J created the unit — dubbed LTL Management — for the express purpose of holding legal liabilities and then filing for Chapter 11.
Why it matters: The ruling undercuts the emerging corporate strategy of using bankruptcy to excise costly liabilities when the organization itself is perfectly solvent.
- “Because LTL was not in financial distress, it cannot show its petition served a valid bankruptcy purpose and was filed in good faith,” a three-judge panel said in its unanimous ruling.
Catch up quick: J&J faces some 38,000 lawsuits from people and their survivors claiming that the company’s talc-based powder caused cancer. J&J has repeatedly denied the allegation.
- Critics say that transferring the litigation claims to the new subsidiary and placing that unit in bankruptcy was a tactic to cap J&J’s exposure to the liabilities.
State of play: At the time it put newly formed subsidiary LTL Management into bankruptcy in October 2021, J&J had an equity value of more than $400 billion, a AAA credit rating, and $31 billion in cash and marketable securities.
- That means it almost surely had ample liquidity to pay LTL’s obligations — and can’t instead use the bankruptcy process, the court ruled. When LTL filed for bankruptcy, J&J was worth at least 25 times more than its estimated total product liabilities over
…
Read the rest